OT GTK/SuSE/Gimp question

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

OT GTK/SuSE/Gimp question

Eric P-3
This is probably way off topic for this ML (so please ignore if you
want), but it started w/the Gimp, so what hell...

I compiled new versions of atk/glib2/gtk2/pango in order to start
checking out the 2.3 series of the Gimp.

Everything went fine.  I removed the old atk/glib2/gtk2/pango RPMs along
w/their respected devel RPMs.  I then make installed (via checkinstall)
all the new GTK and friends, so I now have lovely round RPMs of each
package installed.  Now I compiled Gimp 2.3.0, and, yet again, all went
well.

However, when I run YAST now, it insists on reinstalling the old GTK
(and friends) devel RPMs.  Of course, I don't want to do that as the new
header files are already installed.  The RPMs I created (with
checkinstall) contain the header files.  The RPM packages just weren't
broken out into 2 RPMs per package (i.e., binary RPM and devel RPM) like
SuSE and other distros tend to do.

Any tips on this dilemma?

Thanks for reading,
Eric P

Ps. I'm running SuSE 9.2 pro
_______________________________________________
Gimp-user mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OT GTK/SuSE/Gimp question

BandiPat
On Saturday 04 June 2005 11:44 am, Eric P wrote:

> This is probably way off topic for this ML (so please ignore if you
> want), but it started w/the Gimp, so what hell...
>
> I compiled new versions of atk/glib2/gtk2/pango in order to start
> checking out the 2.3 series of the Gimp.
>
> Everything went fine.  I removed the old atk/glib2/gtk2/pango RPMs
> along w/their respected devel RPMs.  I then make installed (via
> checkinstall) all the new GTK and friends, so I now have lovely round
> RPMs of each package installed.  Now I compiled Gimp 2.3.0, and, yet
> again, all went well.
>
> However, when I run YAST now, it insists on reinstalling the old GTK
> (and friends) devel RPMs.  Of course, I don't want to do that as the
> new header files are already installed.  The RPMs I created (with
> checkinstall) contain the header files.  The RPM packages just
> weren't broken out into 2 RPMs per package (i.e., binary RPM and
> devel RPM) like SuSE and other distros tend to do.
>
> Any tips on this dilemma?
>
> Thanks for reading,
> Eric P
>
> Ps. I'm running SuSE 9.2 pro
=========

Eric,
Did you get any conflicts or dependencies when trying to install the new
rpms?  I would guess you have a mismatch of sorts and that is why YaST2
wants to put things right.  You can go into YaST2 software module and
select those files you installed to set them as protected, so YaST2
doesn't complain continually.  If you have been running YOU to stay
updated, your glib2 files & pango files should be adequate to run Gimp
newer versions, mine is.  I don't have any trouble compiling the newer
Gimp builds either.  Here are presently installed 9.2 versions:
glib2-devel-2.6.3-9
glib2-2.6.3-9
glib2-doc-2.6.3-9

pango-devel-1.4.1-3
pango-1.4.1-3
pango-doc-1.4.1-3

regards,
Patrick

--
--- KMail v1.8 --- SuSE Linux Pro v9.2 ---
      Registered Linux User #225206
There's no problem so awful that you can't
add some guilt to it and make it even worse!  ...Calvin & Hobbes
_______________________________________________
Gimp-user mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user